1. The Plaintiff:

A. The defendant A, B, and C are jointly and severally 48,169,609 won and they are also and severally b.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s claim 1) The Plaintiff is the Defendant A (hereinafter “Defendant A”) around September 2003.

(2) Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”)

(C), C, and D (hereinafter “Defendant D”)

(2) The above court filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff on September 3, 2004 against the plaintiff, as Seoul Central District Court 2003 Gohap68197, and as 3.20% of the amount of subrogated payment under the credit guarantee agreement of December 23, 200 and 125,41,460 won, and the amount of subrogated payment of 125,075,783 won (80,122,60 won on October 23, 200, 200) and 20.3% of the amount of subrogated payment under the credit guarantee agreement of December 26, 200 to 205, 204 to 30.4% of the amount of subrogated payment under the credit guarantee agreement of Seoul Central District Court 205, 30% of the amount of subrogated payment from the 204.25% of the amount of damages for delay, 30% of the total amount of damages for delay from the 206.25% of the amount of Seoul Central Bond.204%.

On February 3, 2004, the above court rendered a ruling that "F shall cancel the above sales contract between F and C within the limit of KRW 165,930,395, and F shall pay the Plaintiff the said money and its delay damages," as its restitution, on the grounds that the sales contract between F and C constituted fraudulent act."

F The appeal and appeal regarding the above judgment were all dismissed, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on April 29, 2005.

3. F around April 27, 2005, which was around the time when the above judgment became final and conclusive, KRW 169,921,90 according to the above judgment against the Plaintiff.