logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.07.21 2016고단865
상해
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. From May 23, 2015 to around 23:30 of the following day, the Defendant: (a) was drinking on the ground that the Defendant was unable to shaken the Victim while drinking alcohol together with the Victim E and the Victim F (SF) in Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, about 11:10 on the following day; (b) on the ground that the Defendant did not break the Victim while drinking alcohol together with E and the Victim F (SF) on the part of the Victim; (c) on the part of E, the Defendant got off the Victim; and (d) during the dispute on the ground that E’s refusal, the Defendant was fluencing the Victim on the part of the Victim; and (d) on the part of the Victim’s Babbbbbbbs, caused the Victim’s disease to go on the part of the Victim, and caused the buck in line with the wall site of the Victim, thereby opening the Victim on the buck and the part on the buck.

2. The evidence directly supporting the facts charged is only the statements made by E in the investigative agency. The above statements made by E are insufficient to have convictions of the defendant to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt as to credibility as follows, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

First, unlike in the investigation agency, E is not only a defendant's assault as stated in the facts charged, but also a defendant's reversal of his statement at the investigation agency and its reason.

was testified.

However, according to the G hospital’s factual inquiry reply where E is currently hospitalized, since it is difficult to grasp the authenticity or intent of this testimony because it is difficult to grasp the truth or intention of this testimony, and the defendant did not have an opportunity to cross-examine substantially, the credibility of the statement made at the investigative agency is to be carefully determined.

E has been investigated by the police and the prosecution several times, and whether or not the defendant has used it, the frequency of time, the victim's side, and the defendant.

arrow