logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.07.22 2015고단2222
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in driving a BM5 vehicle.

1. Around 23:55 on March 13, 2015, the Defendant driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.070% from a restaurant in front of a restaurant where the trade name in the hot spring route of Busan City is unknown to the front intersection in the same hot spring dong to the intersection in front of the same hot spring dong.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidenting Measures) have been driven by the above-mentioned car at the temporary border, and the same intersection road located in the hot spring dong-gu Busan Metropolitan City has been driven from the inner intersection to the hot spring gate.

Since there was an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty to observe the signal and safely drive the person engaged in driving service and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of the Defendant’s negligence in driving sobari while neglecting it, the Defendant shocked the left side of the Daltoba driven by the victim C (the age of 18) who was driving from the right side of the Defendant’s course to the left side of the Defendant’s car to the front side of the right side of the Defendant’s car, and caused the said Oaltoba to shock the victim E-owned by the victim E, who was in the traffic signal atmosphere at the opposite side of the opposite part.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim C, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment. At the same time, the Defendant did not stop the damaged vehicle to the extent that the amount equivalent to KRW 2,365,00 of the repair cost is to exceed KRW 2,365,00, and even if the damaged vehicle was damaged to the extent that the amount equivalent to KRW 609,290 of the repair cost, and escaped without taking measures such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. C, .

arrow