1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the 223 square meters in a permanent address, each point of the attached Table 1, 2, 10, 11, 12, and 1 shall be indicated in the attached sheet.

1. The judgment on the cause of the claim is that the Plaintiff installed a steel-frame fence (hereinafter “instant fence”) on the instant land; the Defendant did not pay a tea on May 16, 2017; the Plaintiff’s termination of the lease agreement to the Defendant on the ground that no dispute exists between the parties or on the grounds that the lease agreement was terminated on the grounds that the Plaintiff did not delay the rent, based on the description in subparagraphs 1 through 5, and the appraisal statement in subparagraphs 1, 2, 2, 10, 11, 12, and 1 of the attached Form No. 20 square meters in the ship (hereinafter “instant land”); and the leased part of 20 square meters in the same year from September 1, 2013 to August 30, 2018; and the appraisal statement in the Republic of Korea Land Information Corporation (hereinafter “instant land”).

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to remove the instant fence to the Plaintiff, deliver the instant land, and pay unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent calculated at the rate of KRW 50,000 per annum from September 1, 2013 to the completion date of delivery of the said land.

2. The defendant's assertion that the defendant agreed not to pay a rent, but because the lease contract (Evidence A 1) explicitly states that the rent is KRW 50,000 per annum, the above argument cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.