The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court, among the facts charged in the instant case, suspended the sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes listed in paragraphs 1 and 2 (the violation of orders and the renunciation of permission without permission), and sentenced the crimes listed in paragraph 3 (the violation of special violence) of the said judgment to a fine.

On the other hand, since the defendant appealed from the part of the crime No. 3, which was decided only by the defendant, on the ground of unfair sentencing, the part of the crime No. 1 and No. 2 in the decision that the defendant and the prosecutor did not appeal was determined as it is and excluded from the scope

2. The summary of the grounds for appeal: The punishment (amounting to five million won) imposed on the crime in paragraph 3 of the judgment of the court below, which was held by the court below, is too unreasonable.

3. The judgment of the court below seems to have determined the punishment within a reasonable scope by sufficiently taking into account the favorable circumstances of the defendant, such as the factors of various sentencing regarding the crime as set forth in paragraph 3 of the judgment, especially the fact that the defendant recognized the crime as set forth in this part of the judgment, in particular, the defendant is living without any criminal history, the defendant has agreed with 24 out of 25 victims of this part, and deposit 30,000 won for the remaining one, etc., and there is no new change in circumstances that may change the sentencing of the court below in the trial. Thus, even considering the circumstances asserted by the defendant for reasons of appeal, the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable.

4. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.