1. The Defendant is limited to the cause of sale on June 20, 2012 with respect to the motor vehicles listed in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff.

1. On January 2012, the Defendant: (a) borrowed a motor vehicle listed in the separate sheet owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant motor vehicle”); (b) refused to return the said motor vehicle by demanding the Plaintiff to repay the vehicle repair cost of KRW 3.5 million and the existing debt amount; and (c) thereafter, the Defendant purchased the instant motor vehicle from the Plaintiff at KRW 6 million on June 20, 2012; and (d) agreed to offset the said purchase price by the Defendant’s claim against the Defendant’s existing debt amount; and (e) even if the Defendant received all documents necessary for the registration of the transfer of ownership of the instant motor vehicle from the Plaintiff, the fact that the ownership transfer registration procedure was not taken over by the Plaintiff as of the date of the closing of argument cannot be acknowledged by dispute between the parties, or by taking into account the entire purport of the pleadings as stated in the evidence No. 1 and No. 2.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to take over the transfer registration procedure for the instant automobile from the Plaintiff on June 20, 2012.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.