logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.11.27 2013고단6390
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall leave Articles on the road, which might impede the traffic flow of the road without permission therefor.

Nevertheless, at around 05:52 on May 15, 2013, the Defendant was driving a front of the Incheon Gyeyang-gu B apartment road from the calculated elementary school to the calculated elementary school from the calculated elementary school. On the other hand, the Defendant was placed on the right side of the moving direction, and the said car, which is an object that might impede traffic, was placed on the road without permission.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and subparagraph 4 of Article 152 and Article 68 (2) of the Road Traffic Act, which choose the penalty for a crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the main charge) of the provisional payment order;

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person engaging in driving a CAD car.

On May 15, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on May 15, 2013, and led the front road of Gyeyang-gu Incheon apartment to the calculated elementary school from the calculation station.

In such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to keep the accident from being delayed by viewing the front side and accurately manipulating the steering direction and brake system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive the vehicle while driving the vehicle by negligence and caused damage to KRW 30,652,200 of the repair cost by shocking the unmanned car pole installed on the right side of the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding with the front part of the vehicle driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused a traffic accident by occupational negligence as above and did not take any measures despite the occurrence of a traffic danger and obstacle, and escaped without leaving the said vehicle on the road.

2. Determination

A. The interpretation of penal provisions shall be strict.

arrow