Text
1. The Defendant: 165,691,432 won for the Plaintiff A; 3,000,000 won for the Plaintiff B; and 2,000,000 won for the Plaintiff C; and each of the above.
Reasons
1. Establishment of liability for damages;
A. The facts of recognition 1) around 07:20 on November 17, 2008, Plaintiff A driven the front of the “E” road located in the Daegu-gun D in the direction of the delalym in the direction of the delam, and entered the intersection at a speed of less than 20 km per hour and left the left at a speed of less than 20 km in the direction of the delam in the direction of the delam. In this case, G entered the intersection at a speed of more than 60 km per hour from the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the two-lanes of the above bus driven by G at a speed of more than 60 km per hour. The two-lanes of the bus driven by G and the two-halfs of the vehicle driven by Plaintiff A conflict (hereinafter “instant accident”).
(2) The instant accident stopped after moving 20 meters away from the left side of the Plaintiff’s car to the left side by shock.
Plaintiff
A due to the shock of the head part of the above accident, A suffered injuries, such as blood transfusions, cerebral cerebrovassis in the award part, impairment of less than fluoral cerebral cerebral le, and fluoral macy in detail.
3) From the point where the instant accident occurred, the direction of the Plaintiff A’s proceeding is the stalth length, and the direction of G is the downway. The Plaintiff’s proceeding direction is somewhat bended to the right side from the point where the three distance expires to the right side. On the contrary, from the direction of G to the point where G is in progress, there is a ndro-ray to the left side on the point where the said three distance reaches the said three distance. At the time of the accident, the said three distance was not installed with a traffic signal, and the road was not installed, and the road was clear, and the weather was clear. 4) The Plaintiff’s mother of the Plaintiff A, the Plaintiff C, and the Plaintiff’s leakage.
The defendant is a mutual aid business operator who has entered into a mutual aid agreement to compensate for human and physical damage caused by an accident that occurred during the operation of H buses owned by creative passengers.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 2-1 to 5, 3, and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings
B. The recognition of the first liability is as follows.