1. The Defendant (Appointeds) and the appointed parties shall jointly and severally serve as KRW 82,139,495 on the Plaintiff and the appointed parties thereof.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the fact that the defendant (appointed party) and the appointed party, who jointly engaged in the household manufacturing business under the trade name of "B", were supplied with the surface-based products, such as the rinking G-20 KM, and the KM and KM, on several occasions from November 30, 2010 to May 31, 2012, and that the price of the goods that the defendant (appointed party) and the appointed party had received from the plaintiff and did not pay to the plaintiff is 82,139,495 won.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant (appointed party) and the appointed party are jointly and severally liable to pay to the plaintiff the amount of KRW 82,139,495 as well as damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from February 14, 2015 to the next day after the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case as requested by the plaintiff, and from February 17, 2015 to the day after full payment is made to the defendant (appointed party).

As to this, Defendant (Appointed Party) and the appointed party set up a defense that the Defendant (Appointed Party) delivered a bill of exchange issued by C to the Plaintiff for the payment of the above goods. However, even according to the assertion itself, it was not actually paid due to the Plaintiff’s default on the payment of the bill. Thus, the above defense by the Defendant (Appointed Party) is without merit.

If so, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant (appointed party) and the appointed party shall be accepted for all reasons, and it is so decided as per Disposition.