Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 100,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives Csi.

On February 14, 2017, the Defendant continued to violate the signal, while driving the above taxi on February 14, 2017, and driving the road in front of the “E” restaurant located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D from the front side of the U. S. A. A., while driving the road at the end of the end of the end of the car death distance, the Defendant continued to run the vehicle signal even though the vehicle signal was a stop signal.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. An explanatory note;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing signal breach photographs;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 156 subparagraph 1 and 5 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The judgement of acquittal shall be pronounced to the defendant, since the alleged defendant has received the notice of payment of penalty and paid the penalty;

2. Determination

A. Article 164(3) of the Road Traffic Act provides that a person who has received a notice of penalty payment and paid the penalty shall not be punished again for the same offense.

B. The record reveals: (a) the Defendant was notified by the head of the Seoul Nowon Police Station on March 28, 2017 to pay a penalty of KRW 60,000 on the same day and filed an objection against the notification on the same day; (b) the Defendant paid a penalty of KRW 60,000 on April 4, 2017 but filed an objection again on April 14, 2017; (c) the Seoul Nowon Police Agency deleted the details of the penalty payment; and (d) thereafter, the Defendant filed a request for an adjudication on the decision against the Defendant with this court; (d) the Seoul Nowon Police Agency dismissed the request on April 24, 2017; and (e) the Seoul Nowon Police Agency sent a notice to the effect that the Defendant was returned the penalty paid on July 26, 2017.

According to the above facts, since the defendant again raises an objection after paying the penalty and the details of penalty payment are cancelled, the defendant has paid the penalty under Article 164 (3) of the Road Traffic Act.