The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

misunderstanding the substance of the grounds for appeal or misunderstanding the legal principles, the defendant entered into an agreement with D (hereinafter referred to as "D"), Hadong-gun, Hadong-dong District Development Project Association (hereinafter referred to as "Korea Development Project Association"), the South East East Power Generation Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Korea"), and the South East East Power Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the South East East Power Development of Korea"), respectively, and actively promoted the project for reclaiming coal as soil for reclaiming coal (hereinafter referred to as "project in this case"), and the project for using coal as soil for reclamation in the "Yeo Mangsan Factory Complex Construction Corporation". On May 201, 201, the defendant submitted a plan for changing the content of consultation to the free economic zone authority of the Yeongsanyang-dong District Development Project, which is a foundation operated by the defendant, and it should be deemed that the Seomjin District Environment Agency's consultation about the change of the content of consultation to the free economic zone authority of 10,000,000.

On September 24, 2012, the Defendant received a reply from both sides of the national land and the Ministry of Environment that “it is possible to use coal materials as a soil for reclaiming public waters” on September 24, 2012, and “it is possible to use coal materials as a soil for reclaiming public waters” from the Ministry of Environment on November 2, 2012. Thus, the Defendant completed administrative procedures necessary to use coal materials for the reclamation work.

In addition, one victim F is the Korea Development Bank account in the name of Korea on March 10, 2010.