logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2017.05.08 2017노71
존속살해등
Text

Defendant

In addition, the appeal by the person who requested the attachment order is dismissed.

Reasons

The sentence (15 years of imprisonment) sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable in light of the various sentencing conditions of the defendant's appeal concerning the part of the case.

Judgment

Examining the various sentencing conditions of this case, the fact that the defendant suffered from mental illness for a long time, and the crime of this case was committed with mental and physical weakness due to the above mental illness, and that there was no particular criminal history except for those punished due to drinking driving and traffic accidents, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

Meanwhile, the Defendant’s act of committing the instant crime is a normal situation unfavorable to the Defendant, such as: (a) the Defendant’s mother divided the victim’s side knee into knee and prevented the victim from leaving his school; and (b) the victim’s knee away from his knee to death; (c) in light of the relationship with the victim; (d) the motive for committing the instant crime; (e) the motive for committing the instant crime; and (e) the method and details of the instant crime; (b) the Defendant’s spacing the Defendant’s life for a long period of time; (c) the result of the Defendant’s spacuous crime; (d) the Defendant’s kneing the victim’s knee and knee that the victim’s life was lost; (e) the Defendant’s knee to the remaining bereaved family members, such as the Defendant’s penal system; and (e) even if the Defendant’s knished

As above, comprehensively taking into account all the factors of sentencing favorable or unfavorable to the defendant, including the following factors: the defendant's age, sex and environment, family relation, motive and background of the crime, method of the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., and all of the factors of sentencing as indicated in the record and the theory of changes in the sentencing guidelines, and the court below appears to have sentenced 15 years to the defendant who is the lowest sentence recommended to the defendant within the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines (at least 15 years of imprisonment, longer than a life imprisonment), and the court below's sentence at the trial.

arrow