Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the head of the E Housing Redevelopment Project Association.

1. On August 18, 2010, the Defendant entered into a design service contract, etc. with the owner of the building for the design services, etc. of the housing redevelopment improvement project being implemented by the said partnership, which is executed by the said partnership, under the name of the general meeting of the association members, with the owner of the building as an engineering of the general construction office of the non-party corporation, a joint construction office of the non-party corporation, without the resolution of the general meeting of the association members, and entered into a contract with the association members other than the matters prescribed by the budget without the resolution of the general

2. On January 25, 2011, the Defendant entered into a contract for construction works for housing redevelopment improvement projects implemented by the said partnership without a resolution of the general meeting of the association members, with the said partnership, the said partnership, the construction executor as a stock company, and Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd., with the amount of construction costs at KRW 245.125 million, and entered into a contract for construction works for housing redevelopment improvement projects implemented by the said partnership without a resolution of the general meeting of the association members, in addition to the matters

3. Around January 25, 2011, the Defendant entered into a monetary loan agreement with a notary public in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government distribution Dong at a law firm democratic office with the debtor as the partnership, creditor company, Daewoo Construction Co., Ltd., and Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd., and entered into a contract for a monetary loan with the amount of KRW 5 billion with respect to housing redevelopment improvement project funds implemented by the above partnership.

Accordingly, the defendant did not go through a resolution of the general meeting on the lending of funds, the method, interest rate, and repayment method, and entered into a contract to become a partner's burden without a resolution of the general meeting of partners.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The second police suspect examination protocol (including theG statement protocol) against the accused;

1. Each police statement of the accusation and H. 1.