logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.03.17 2016나2057787
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the part of the “reason” in the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

However, in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, the expression “Defendant Substitute Construction” is deemed to be “alternative Construction”, “Defendants” to be “Defendant”, “registration number D” to be “registration number G”, “Appraisal Witness E” to the third 16-17 of the third 16-17 shall be deemed to be “Registration Number G”, “Appraisal Witness E” to the fourth 2-3 of the fourth 2-3 of the court, “Expert F of this court” to be “Expert F of the first instance court,” “this court’s 4-5 of the fifth 5th 4-5” to be “Court of the first instance,” respectively, and the third 13-14 of the third 3-14 shall be deleted.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow