The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In relation to the crime of interference with the business set forth in No. 2, No. 3, 6, 10, and 15 of the List of Crimes attached to the court below by misunderstanding the facts or misunderstanding the legal principles, the defendant only prepared a transaction application while applying for the opening of an account under the name of the corporation, and did not make a false response to the purpose of financial transaction by preparing a written confirmation

In addition, the indication or signature seal of the customer confirmation column is merely the fact that the defendant has given an explanation about the contents that the bank must explain.

Therefore, since there was no deception on Defendant’s bank employees, it cannot be recognized that the Defendant’s purpose of opening the account is irrelevant to the operation of the corporation.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment, additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. We examined the argument of misunderstanding of facts or misapprehension of legal principles, and the defendant also argued the same purport in the court below (the court below argued about the crime that interfered with the business again No. 2 a year 2 a. 3 a. 2 a. 2 a. 2 a. 3 a. 3 a. 3 a. 3 a. 4 a. 4 a. 4 a. 4 a. 4 a. 166 a. 16 a. 16 a. 166 a. 166 a. 166 a. 166 a. 166 a. 166 a. 166 a. 201. 202 a. 206 a. 200 . 166 a. 200 .).