Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

C is a possessor of 99 square meters of a cement blupty roof on the ground of Siung-si D (hereinafter “instant land”). The instant housing was constructed after E, which is the announcement date of the said project, and was removed due to administrative vicarious execution on November 7, 1997, and was restored by C before April 17, 200.

C was ordered to remove facilities on the ground that the instant housing was constructed after E, the date of the public notice of “F,” from the Silung market on June 10, 2014, upon which C received an order of removal of facilities, etc., on July 10, 2014, upon filing a lawsuit against the Silung District Court 2014Guhap5992 against the Silung City on July 10, 2014, but lost at the first instance of May 14, 2015. The Seoul High Court appealed (Seoul High Court 2015Nu44488), but appealed on December 9, 2015, but the Supreme Court appealed as the Supreme Court 2015Du60433, but was dismissed on March 11, 2016.

At around January 23, 2015, the Defendant was the owner of the instant land, and was present and take an oath at the court No. 2014Guhap55992 of the Suwon District Court No. 202, Suwon District Court No. 4, 2015, 16:30, the Defendant stated that the Plaintiff was the owner of the instant land, and stated that the Plaintiff was “I will,” and “I will like to, take an inquiry of the Plaintiff’s legal representative, i.e., that the Plaintiff re-enters the instant building which was scattered in the middle, or that there is no fact,.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have resided in the instant house from January 197, but did not have been constructed before E, and later, was aware of the fact that the instant house was removed once by administrative vicarious execution and was restored.