(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.11.30 2016고정825

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.11.30 2016고정825

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 13, 2016, around 17:00 on April 17, 2016, the Defendant, while talking about an election, political, and farmers' association at the welfare center of the D 2nd floor located in the window C in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, he was a victim E (year 68 years of age) and spabbling with each other.

In order for the victim to enter the victim's fingers into the defendant's entrance, the victim's fingers were faced with the victim's fingers for about 14 days on the right side, which requires treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Determination as to the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel

1. The gist of the assertion is that the defendant asked the injured person's fingers to recognize the occurrence of the injury.

① However, in light of the following: (a) the victim unilaterally breath of the Defendant’s breath culture; (b) the Defendant did not have sufficient health to the extent that he could undergo an operation with brain fat; (c) the Defendant was aware of this fact; and (d) the Defendant continued to breath of the Defendant’s breath and breath of the Defendant’s breath from the defense breath of the breath because the breath caused the Defendant’s breath of the bat, the Defendant’s act is dismissed

2. The victim stated as to the circumstances of the instant case that he was sealed by the Defendant’s head while entering the Defendant’s head; however, the victim’s fingers in contact with the Defendant’s entrance, thereby resulting in the Defendant’s fingers, and the Defendant’s fingers, and the Defendant’s quickly fell from the Defendant’s fighting.

On the other hand, the defendant, as alleged above, was found to have omitted his front in the process of unilaterally balping his balping, and even if the victim knew of this, the attack by the victim is continued and defense against this.

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 2017.05.25 2016노3310

-부산지방법원 2015.09.11 2015노1609

-춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2018.02.08 2017노533

-창원지방법원 2020.11.18 2020고정384

-대전지방법원 2015.05.28 2014노2990