logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.10.22 2015구합100067
부당강등 구제 재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the decision on retrial;

A. The Plaintiff is a school foundation operating the D University, etc., and D University is a university affiliated with the Plaintiff, which has 1,002 teachers (including 317 full-time teachers), 466 part-time instructors, etc. The Intervenor Intervenor B (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) from March 1, 2009, and the Intervenor C from March 1, 2008 to February 28, 2014, as an invited professor at D University’s contractual position.

B. However, the Plaintiff, while having the Intervenor work at D University even after February 28, 2014, did not renew the existing contract for appointment of visiting teachers, and instead, between the Intervenor and the Intervenor, the Intervenor will be the same year.

3.3. From the same year; and

8. By March 31, 200, each contract of employment was concluded with D University as a foreign professor (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant part-time lecturer employment contract”).

C. On May 23, 2014, the intervenors recognized that the Plaintiff’s refusal to appoint the invited teachers and the appointment of part-time lecturers conducted by the Plaintiff to the Intervenor on May 23, 2014 (hereinafter “Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission”) was unfair and unfair. The Intervenor made an application for remedy to the effect that it was unfair and unfair. On July 31, 2014, the Gyeongbuk District Labor Relations Commission concluded the instant labor contract that is distinct from the existing visiting teachers and continued to work at the D University. Accordingly, there is no dismissal or demotion. The Intervenor dismissed the Intervenor’s request for remedy to the effect that the Intervenor’s request was dismissed.

In the event that the Plaintiff entered into a labor contract on March 11, 2014 with respect to the Intervenor B, and with respect to the Intervenor C on March 26, 2014, granting its position as a part-time lecturer who is not an visiting professor is an unfair lecture, etc.

Within 30 days from the date of receipt of the written determination, the Plaintiff’s restoration to the status of visiting teachers, and the amount equivalent to wages and the status of part-time lecturers that could have been received if he/she worked as the status of visiting teachers during the period of unfair lectures.

arrow