1. The Defendant: (a) paid KRW 176,424,470 to the Plaintiff, as well as KRW 6% per annum from May 2, 2018 to November 27, 2018; and (b) November 28, 2018.

1. Where the purport of the entire pleadings is added to each description set forth in Section A1 through 4, the Plaintiff sells high-quality portion of wheat 1S, etc. to the Defendant operating “C” by April 10, 2018, as a company established on April 15, 2013 for the purpose of wholesale and retail sales business of food materials, etc.:

5.2. Recognizing the fact that the accounts receivable are 176,424,470 won.

The defendant asserts that the defendant's personal business chain, which was operated by the representative director of the plaintiff company prior to the incorporation of the plaintiff company, had less outstanding amounts, but in transactions with the plaintiff company, it is not possible to respond to the plaintiff's claim unless it is confirmed whether the claims and obligations are comprehensively transferred between the plaintiff company and D. However, in addition to the whole arguments in each of the statements in Eul 1-1 through 2-2, it is reasonable to view that the defendant agreed to continue to maintain the previous transactional relationship without settlement of the existing claims and obligations after the incorporation of the plaintiff company and then transfer the claims of the defendant's personal company against the defendant to the plaintiff company as the stock company

Therefore, barring special circumstances, the defendant is obligated to pay the outstanding amount and damages for delay after May 2, 2018.

2. The defendant's assertion of set-off against the defendant is as follows: the plaintiff made unjust enrichment of 2482 million won as if he were to supply the part containing the non-nets to the market, and 49.6 million won, such as having the defendant install a refining facility and employ one employee in exclusive charge; the defendant suffered damages at a cost amounting to 4.6 million won; the high-quality exclusive charge 1S supplied by the plaintiff to the plaintiff, which is changed if he manufactured a grass by using it, shall be decided to pay the 1.46 million cost as the cost of double selling, and the amount equivalent to 79.8 million won shall be discarded as it is, and the disposal cost shall be about 2755 million won.