logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2006.04.13 2006노583
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The number of days of confinement before the pronouncement of this judgment shall be 69 days in the penalty of the original judgment.

Reasons

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal by the defendant is that the sentencing of the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable in light of the overall circumstances such as the defendant's mistake, the fact that the defendant has been repented and reflected in depth, the agreement with some victims, the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the family environment, etc.

2. Examining the records, such as the Defendant’s age, character, and conduct, and family environment, the Defendant committed the instant crime at the same time and at the same time during the period of repeated crime, the lower court committed the instant crime, and the lower court sentenced to discretionary mitigation in relation to the instant crime, and sentenced the Defendant who cannot be sentenced to suspended sentence due to the lapse of three years after the execution of imprisonment was completed, and all other conditions that form the basis for sentencing specified in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and family environment, the lower court is deemed appropriate to have sentenced the Defendant to imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, even considering the circumstances that the Defendant was under way in the

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit and is dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the number of 69 days of confinement prior to the pronouncement of this judgment pursuant to Article 57 of the Criminal Act is to be included in the punishment of the court below (However, the court below's decision is delivered with the order of " December 19, 2001" to "the 1st day of the crime of the court below," and the 2nd day " June 21, 2003" to "the 15th day of Jan. 15, 2004" and the 4th day "four times" to "three times"

arrow