logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.03.26 2014구합17524
생계곤란감면처분거부처분취소및현역병입영통지취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff was enlisted to be enlisted in active service after being judged at physical Grade III in a physical examination for conscription conducted on November 25, 2008 with B, but was postponed on the ground that he was enrolled in a university from April 9, 2009 to September 28, 2012, on the ground that he was enrolled in a university.

On September 26, 2013, the Plaintiff applied for enlistment in the second citizen service due to family reasons to the Defendant.

The Defendant, on January 22, 2014, refused an application for military service reduction or exemption on the following grounds: (a) 0:180,850,000 1,027, 417 0:18,850,000 1,027, 417 0:17 0:136,218,7230, 7230 0:1241,65,3660 on the fulfillment of the requirements of 0:136:230,7230 0:1241,665, 3660 on the part of the Plaintiff’s family members; (b) 1:8,850,00 the amount of the Plaintiff’s family’s property, including the amount of the Plaintiff’s property, was not verified as a result of deliberation and resolution by the deliberative committee on difficult livelihood; and (c) 2:1) the Defendant, on January 22, 2014.

(hereinafter “instant refusal disposition”). [The details of the Plaintiff’s family’s property ] 241,665,643 - 31,50,000 won of the deposit (the amount corresponding to 70/100 of the deposit amount of 45,00,000 won) - 3,617,633 won of the deposit amount - 1,101,090 won of the deposit amount of 205,446,643 won of the outstanding premium - The Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the enlistment in active duty service on August 26, 2014.

(2) The Plaintiff’s mother C and the account in the name of the Plaintiff’s her mother C and the Plaintiff’s her living together with the Plaintiff’s account borrowed from C, and the amount deposited from the said account cannot be deemed as the Plaintiff’s family’s property. The Plaintiff’s her mother’s son and the Plaintiff’s her living together with the Plaintiff’s her own son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.

On the other hand, in the above account.

arrow