beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a company established for the purpose of advertising and event agency business. Defendant D is a person who, from November 8, 2010 to January 31, 2013, worked as the Plaintiff’s overall team leader of the project and has overall control over the preparation, submission, etc. of the project proposal for the “G” event supervised by Seoul Metropolitan Government. 2) Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) is a company that prepares the project proposal, holds events, etc., and Defendant F is the representative of Defendant C, and H and I are employees (the team leader) of Defendant C.
3) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”).
(B) A company engaged in advertising, event agency, etc., and Defendant E overall control over the planning and implementation of the public performance, exhibition, and event as the director general of Defendant B’s bureau, and Nonparty J served as the vice-director of Defendant B from September 2007. A double preparation of Defendant C’s project proposal and Defendant B’s project owner (i) Seoul Metropolitan Government held an annual event under the name of “G” to strengthen the international competitiveness of Korea K, thereby holding an event to invite an institution entrusted with the event to carry out the event, and (ii) in the event of “L” event (hereinafter “instant project”), which will take place in December 21, 2013, it publicly announced the recruitment of the entrusted institution as KRW 3.1 billion on December 21, 2012; and (iii) received the project proposal on January 10, 2013, and then announced the designation and announcement of the business owner on January 15, 2013.
2) The Plaintiff entered into a service agreement with the Defendant C, which was in charge of preparing the Plaintiff’s project proposal and being in charge of the progress of the project in November 201 and 2012, as seen earlier, around November 201, in order to receive the instant project, due to the experience in ordering the services of the G project held in the year 201 and 2012, to receive the instant project (hereinafter “instant first service agreement”).
After that, Defendant C’s business proposal is subsequent to the Plaintiff.