logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2017.03.21 2016가단4244
소유권말소등기
Text

1. On September 1, 2015, the Defendant received the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on September 1, 2015 with respect to the land size of 793 square meters in Seosan-si.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The network D (D, death on November 20, 207, hereinafter “the deceased”) had the Plaintiff, F, G, H, and I as their children between the wife E.

B. On May 31, 1918, the deceased J was examined on May 31, 1918, and on December 3, 1971, the deceased, the grandchildren of the deceased J, entered the registration of ownership in the forest land register for the above forest land.

On July 6, 197, the area of the forest land C 8 in Seosan-gun is converted into a square meter, and on January 1, 1995, the administrative district was changed and finally registered as the 793 square meters of the forest land C 793 square meters in Seosan-si (hereinafter “instant forest”).

C. On the land of the instant forest, there are graves owned by the Plaintiff’s denied deceased, his father, K, and J, the father of his father.

In addition, the Plaintiff holds a certificate of the right to register the forest of this case.

On the other hand, the copy of the register of the forest of this case is indicated as the completion of registration of preservation of ownership by the Daejeon District Court No. 16857 on December 13, 1971.

E. On May 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) rendered a decision to commence compulsory sale of the instant forest land (O) by the court on May 26, 2014, with the original copy of the payment order (No. 2014Da5666) against L (NL) as the debtor; and (b) on August 31, 2015, the Defendant sold the instant forest land at auction and paid the proceeds therefrom during the compulsory sale procedure.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 through 7, Gap evidence 11, Gap evidence 10, each video and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff 1's summary of the plaintiff's assertion is the owner of the forest of this case, and the plaintiff was donated the forest of this case from the deceased, and the "Sesan-gun M", which is the address recorded in the register of the forest of this case, is only a clerical error in the "Sesan-gun P".

Therefore, the debtor L is not the owner of the forest of this case, and the case is commenced by the executive title of L.

arrow