Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Criminal facts

Although beneficiaries of unemployment benefits are not receiving unemployment benefits by fraud or other improper means, on March 09, 2009, the defendant applied for recognition of unemployment benefits as the unemployment benefits amounting to 150 days for unemployment benefits, 230,400 won for job-seeking benefits, and 8,800 won for unemployment benefits on March 24, 2009, without filing a report on the commencement of self-employment with an insurance solicitor with the Ministry of Employment and Labor within the Jung-gu Regional Employment and Labor Employment Office in the Republic of Korea on March 03, 2009, and on March 03, 2009, for recognition of unemployment benefits amounting to 150 days for unemployment benefits, 230,40 won for job-seeking benefits, and 806,400 won for the same year, and 806,400 won for the same year, 806,400 won for 19,800 won for 16,408,407

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Current status of unemployment benefits unlawful recipients;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to individuals' benefits;

1. Relevant Article 116 (2) of the Employment Insurance Act and Article 116 (2) of the Act on the Selection of Punishment for Criminal Facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case with the sentencing reason of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is the case where the defendant pretends that he is the actual worker and defrauds unemployment benefits, and the criminal quality of the defendant is not good in light of the method of crime, etc.

However, in light of all the sentencing conditions shown in the trial of this case, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, that a significant portion of the unemployment benefits received by the defendant was returned, and that the defendant was the first offender, the punishment shall be determined as ordered.