logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.02.06 2019고단7026
상습도박
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On January 28, 2015, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 4 million as a crime of gambling at the Suwon District Court, and on July 28, 2016, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 4 million as a crime of violating the National Sports Promotion Act (gambling, etc.) at the same court on July 28, 2016, and received a summary order of KRW 5 million as a crime of gambling in the same court on February 7, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

On February 13, 2019, the Defendant connected to “E”, which is an illegal Internet gambling site providing gambling services, such as ‘D’ and ‘D’ using a mobile phone in Suwon-si B building, and in subparagraph C, the Defendant transferred KRW 2,00,000 from the company bank account (Account Number G) in the name of the F, E, the Defendant, to H, a business bank account in the name of H, a corporate bank account (Account Number I), which is the operation account of the above site, charged the game money in an amount of money that can be exchanged in the corresponding amount, and predicted the result and predicted whether the amount of money could be determined at will, then if the result of betting is met, the Defendant received dividends, and remitted the amount of money to 1970,000 won in total from that time to March 14, 2019, as stated in the separate sheet, to 1960,000 won in total, as stated in the separate sheet.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement of bank customer CIF data, entry into gambling sites, and details of withdrawal transactions;

1. Photographss and data (a copy of a gambling site);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: One copy of criminal records, investigation report (change of the same kind of force and rate of suspect), Suwon District Court Decision 2014 High Court Decision 24289, one copy of summary order, one copy of Suwon District Court Decision 2016 High Court Decision 2016 High Court Decision 987, one copy of Non-written Decision 2017 and 5068 of the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office, one copy of each written decision and written opinion, and one copy of Suwon District Court Decision 2017 High Court Decision 3204;

1. Habituality of the judgment: dampness-accredited Acts and subordinate statutes in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same kind in the judgment; and

arrow