logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.10.29 2015고정1452
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 10, 2015, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle with a gallon’s alcohol concentration of approximately 0.131% from the section of about 390 meters, while under the influence of alcohol, from the front side of the road located in the Jeonsung-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Seoul to the front intersection of the half-gu bridge located in the same route.

2. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle for a gallon course in accordance with the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act.

At around 21:10 on June 10, 2015, the Defendant tried to walk the time zone of the said car parked on the front road located in the front of the Gyeong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Seoul, and to proceed from the right side of the blue-do.

In such cases, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to live well in the front left and safely drive the vehicle to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the backer of the Fsch Rexton vehicle owned by the victim E, parked in front of the Defendant’s vehicle, due to his negligence while under the influence of alcohol, and got the backer of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was parked in front of the Defendant’s vehicle, to the fronter of the Defendant’s vehicle, and due to the shock, the said Bosch Rexton vehicle moved to an opposite lane beyond the central line, while driving from the half-gu bridge to the righter of the Defendant’s G (n.e., the 53-year-old driver’s seat of the Defendant’s vehicle) driving seat, etc. of the said Fschton vehicle.

The Defendant continued to go back to the Defendant’s car as above and continued to go back to the Defendant’s vehicle, and subsequently parked after the Defendant’s vehicle, received the fronter of the Defendant’s Jknif vehicle owned by the victim I.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim G by the foregoing occupational negligence, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, the above 4,48,950 U.S. car repair cost to the extent that the above 4,448,950 U.S. car repair cost is sufficient to the extent that the 1,269,904 won is the repair cost.

arrow