logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.02.12 2014나13389
부당이득금반환
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) adding “A evidence No. 1” to “(based on recognition”) No. 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) 9 through 15 of the same face are as the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the same is used as follows; and (c) thereby, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of

【The part used by Defendant D, without title from August 30, 2012, the successful bid date of the Plaintiff’s instant building, until March 26, 2013, when delivery of the first floor below the instant building was completed, can be acknowledged that Defendant D occupied the first floor below the instant building without title. The facts of recognition are as follows: (a) it appears that Defendant B had borne approximately KRW 60,000,000 for the artificial test cost on the first floor below the instant ground; (b) it appears that Defendant B had worked in the above studs and used for the studs; and (c) it was directly and indirectly occupied the instant 1st floor for the same business with Defendant D, D, and C. In addition to the facts that Defendant B had been involved in operation, such as supervision, etc.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants should be accepted in its reasoning, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the defendants' appeal is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow