Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the Defendants, the period of one year from the date when this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, around 03:00 on August 18, 2016, at the 4 main points of “D” located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, i.e., the victim E, and the victim F, who were drinking in the same manner as tin, set up their own bags to their own visitors, followed the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the rest of the other victims, and recruited them by dividing them into theft, and following the public invitation, Defendant B, in cash, 40,000 won, from the wall located in the wall of the victim E-owned.

Defendant A shall take 10,000 won in cash on a wall that is located in the bank owned by the victim F.

They have come to her.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victims' property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of E and F;

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 331(2) and 331(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Small-scale mitigated Defendants: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants on probation: Grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. The basic area (from June to June) of the sentencing criteria [the scope of recommended punishment] for the larceny of general property (general larceny) (no person who has any special sentencing factor];

2. The defendants' criminal acts of this case committed by the defendants with the sentence of imprisonment of this case committed by larceny of 50,000 won in cash from the victim's wall who was going to sit in and drinking together, and the nature of the crime is not good.

However, the amount of damage was not significant due to contingent crimes, and the amount of damage was remitted to victims to restore the damage.

Defendants are aware of crimes and reflect in depth the mistake.

There is no record of punishment or punishment exceeding a fine for the same crime.

In addition, the sentencing factors as shown in the trial process of this case, such as the age and sexual conduct of the Defendants, shall be determined as per the order.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.