A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 16, 2014, at around 01:10, the Defendant: (a) called “D cafeteria” located in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, where he received a report and demanded the Defendant to return home by F.g., the circumstances surrounding the E District Party affiliated with the E District, and by G slope; and (b) took the front of the restaurant, the Defendant: (c) stated that the F.m. “N. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 136 (Selection of Imprisonment or Imprisonment);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of recommending punishment]; consideration of the crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties; the obstruction of performance of official duties (type 1); the basic area; six months to one year and four months (Pronouncement 1); the imprisonment with prison labor for six months; the imprisonment with prison labor for not less than three months; the imprisonment with prison labor for not less than three years; contingent efforts for recovery of damage (a million won deposit); and serious reflections; etc.