A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 3, 2014, around 19:38, the Defendant: (a) 112 reported that the Defendant sent the gate No. 202 in the Jung-gu, Seoul, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, committed assault against the Defendant, such as the Defendant, who continuously sent the gate for about 20 minutes as seen above, while taking a bath, “I am, according to the law, I am saw, I am saw, I am son, and am am son, and am son, who was called “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am am, I am am, and am am on several occasions.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is a crime that has undermined the function of the State by nullifyinging a legitimate exercise of public authority, and thus, it is necessary to strictly punish the crime in order to establish the legal order of the State and eradicate

However, the defendant shall be sentenced to punishment as ordered in consideration of the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.