logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.07.20 2016나54150
임관리비 등
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that is delegated by Seoul Metropolitan Government with the right to occupy and use, and to manage and operate, the shopping mall of underground shopping mallss located in C Group (hereinafter “instant shopping mall”).

B. On September 16, 2010, the Defendant: (a) between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on September 16, 2010, leased deposit KRW 518,930,00 (the KRW 140,00,000 among them shall be converted to monthly rent); (b) monthly rent of KRW 64,000/land size (the basis for exclusive use in 201, surcharges); and (c) monthly rent conversion according to the special agreement; (d) separately determined and leased each of the instant commercial buildings as “one year from the date of completion of the lease period; and (e) one year from the date of occupancy” (hereinafter “lease”); and (e) was handed over and used until October 6, 201, by which an employee who had been employed before completion of the instant commercial building was issued.

C. However, on March 24, 2014, the Plaintiff was decided to discontinue the rehabilitation procedure (property KRW 3.6 billion, debt KRW 63.4 billion), and on February 2, 2015, on the ground that “it is impossible to implement the rehabilitation plan,” and the lessee did not pay rent, management fee, etc. to the Plaintiff.

The defendant also did not pay rent and management expenses from August 2015, and the unpaid principal including rent and management expenses from August 6, 2015 to October 5, 2015 is KRW 4,642,078.

E. Meanwhile, on September 1, 2016, the instant lease was explicitly renewed, and the Defendant expressed his/her intent to refuse to renew the lease by displaying the content-certified mail stating that “as soon as the date of surrender can be immediately removed, the security deposit to be returned may be prepared and the date of surrender may be known to the Plaintiff.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the defendant, barring special circumstances, seeks the plaintiff to pay unpaid rent, management fee totaling KRW 4,642,078, and the plaintiff.

arrow