1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) receives KRW 150,020,000 from the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

(5) In light of the following facts: (i) the father of the Plaintiffs and the father of the Plaintiff around April 201 (hereinafter “instant real estate”) concluded a lease contract with the Defendant for KRW 30 million, monthly rent of KRW 220,000, and period of lease from April 15, 201 to April 14, 201 (hereinafter “instant lease contract”); (ii) the Defendant appears to have refused to conclude the said lease contract with the Defendant for KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.

According to the above facts, since the lease contract of this case terminated upon the expiration of the lease term, the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate of this case to the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs are jointly obligated to return the lease deposit amount of KRW 30 million to the defendant.

(See Supreme Court Decision 98Da43137 delivered on December 8, 1998, etc.). Also, the defendant is a commercial building.