1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the instant case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the court citing the reasoning of the judgment or adding the judgment on the argument that the plaintiff made in the trial of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

(Other matters alleged by the Plaintiff in the trial are not significantly different from the contents alleged by the Plaintiff in the first instance trial, and even if all of the evidence submitted in the first instance and the trial are examined, the judgment of the first instance court that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable). [The part to be dismissed] If the second and fifth instances of the first instance judgment are discovered, “the discovery and finding,” and “ November 14, 2016.”

The head of the District Education Office of Busan District Office of Education of the 2nd 2nd 15 through 16th 16th 18th 5th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 100

From the six pages of the judgment of the first instance court, the 6th "Nos. 2 and 3" was "Nos. 1 and 3," and the 6th "this court" was "the first instance court."

In the judgment of the first instance, 7 pages 13 of the 13th judgment "transfer" is regarded as "transfer".

In the first instance court's 12th 12th 12th 3th , "13938" is dismissed as "No. 13938", and the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes (additional) shall be added from 12th 12th to 7th 7th .

【Supplementary Decision】

A. Defendant’s assertion 1) The year 2014, which the Plaintiff appointed, engaged in a serious misconduct in the course of the recruitment of regular teachers, such as “the preparation of a pre-examination site and answer sheet,” and “the preparation of an evaluation sheet after the completion of the written examination,” which is considerably infringed on the strictness and fairness required for the appointment of private school teachers. Furthermore, according to Articles 53-2(1)1, 16(1)5 and 18-2(1) of the Private School Act, the appointment of private school teachers shall be subject to a resolution by the board of directors on the recommendation of the head of the relevant school, and the minutes of the board of directors shall be prepared. However, B on February 24, 2014.