A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, through the victim C (Y, 23 years of age) and the Internet Internet site “D”, had sexual intercourse with the victim, and took and kept a photograph of the victim’s personal body and the Defendant’s sexual act with the victim using the cell phone camera function.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Kameras and other crimes);

A. On July 7, 2015, from around 12:25 to 16:03, the Defendant sent a photograph of the victim’s sexual act against the victim’s will to a person who uses an Internet E-mail conversation “F” in a remote space from around 12:25 to around 16:03, and distributed a photograph of the victim’s sexual act taken against the victim’s will.

B. On July 7, 2015, from around 13:35 to 13:42, the Defendant sent a copy of a photograph taken of the victim’s negative part against the victim’s will to a person who uses an Internet E-mail conversation “G” in the name of the Internet E-mail at an insular space, and distributed it.

(c)

On July 9, 2015, the Defendant sent three copies of pictures showing the victim’s body against the victim’s will to a person who uses an Internet E-mail conversation “F” at a fluoring site on July 19, 2015.

(d)

On July 10, 2015, from around 22:32 to 22:51, the Defendant sent to a person who uses the Internet E-mail conversation “H” in the name of the victim against the victim’s will and one photograph photograph taken of the victim’s personal body against the victim’s will to distribute it.

2. Intimidation: (a) from around 10:58 on July 15, 2015 to around 18:58, the Defendant used the Defendant’s home located in I underground of Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and (b) used the Defendant’s mobile phone to use the Defendant’s mobile phone, and (c) used the Defendant’s home to find out that the Defendant had a pair of years, and that there was no constant contact at this time, the Defendant would become Stockholm one year thereafter.