A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who conducts a business providing Internet computer game facilities in the name of “C” on the first floor of the building B in Daegu Metropolitan City.

No one shall provide game products, the contents of which are different from those of the game products rated by the Game Products Management Committee.

Nevertheless, from May 2019 to February 7, 2020, the Defendant provided five computers to unspecified customers by installing five computers and searching for them (in indirect chargings to acquire game money through the purchase of Abathy after filling for capital) separate from the content of a rating classification, the Defendant provided that “new primary game (which is composed of a new primary pool, a new primary pool pool, a new primary pool pool, and a new primary base pool)” the content of which was changed in a way of charging directly game money to members ID created without one’s own certification through a separate manager page.

As a result, the defendant provided game products with contents different from the game products classified by the Game Management Committee for use.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Seizure records, etc.;

1. A written report on the results of appraisal;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the facts constituting a crime and subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Selection of Punishment and Promotion of Game Industry;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentence shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant's reason for sentencing in the first sentence of Article 44 (2) of the Act on the Promotion of Confiscation Industry is not good, and the defendant committed the crime in this case even if there are the records of the same kind of crime, and the possibility of criticism is high, and favorable circumstances, such as the defendant's age, environment, means and consequence of the crime, and all the other favorable conditions of sentencing, including the circumstances after the crime