1. Based on the notarial deed No. 538 of March 25, 2015 by the Defendant’s notary public C office against Nonparty B, the list in the attached Form No. 538 of March 25, 2015.

1. The following facts are acknowledged in light of the following facts, unless there is no dispute between the parties to the determination of the claim, or the records in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 10, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the movables listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “the movables of this case”) are owned by the plaintiff, barring any other circumstances.

(A) Accordingly, the Defendant’s assertion that the instant movable is owned by B is not accepted, since B purchased the instant movable from the Plaintiff in installments.

On March 25, 2015, the Defendant filed a motion for compulsory execution of corporeal movables pursuant to the No. 538 of the notary office C Office C against B, and accordingly, the execution officer of the Busan District Court issued a motion for the seizure of corporeal movables against the instant movables by the court No. 2015No. 1743 on March 25, 2015.

B. On March 13, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with B on the condition that the Plaintiff would escape the instant movable property.

[Lene period: from March 11, 2013 to March 10, 2017, and sirens: KRW 4,099,810 (including value-added tax) per month.

B received the notice from the Plaintiff on September 2014, stating that he would not pay a siren fee under the above contract, and pay it.

2. The plaintiff's claim of this case is justified.