The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the victim misunderstanding of the facts in the court below's decision was suffering from the Kakkyl (the crym in the field) by the person who committed an indecent act against himself, and cited the bags, and that he was at the time of his decision.

Although the Defendant made a statement at the time of the instant case, there was no fact that at the time of the instant case, the Defendant was suffering from the shorter length of the flag (humcona) and did not blick the door, and did not get out of the subway.

Moreover, since subways at the time were in a situation of booming booming for many people, it cannot be readily concluded that a person who commits an indecent act against the victim in the subway is the defendant.

The police officer F considered that the police officer was fit for the defendant, etc. while he was unable to completely memory the location and clothes of the victim and the defendant.

There is no credibility in statements.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case cannot be recognized as an indecent act against the victim was erroneous and adversely affected by the conclusion of the judgment.

The sentencing of the court below's unfair sentencing (the imprisonment of April, the suspension of execution of two years, and the order to attend the lecture for treatment of sexual assault for twenty-four hours) is too unreasonable.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of misunderstanding of the facts as to the grounds for appeal, i.e., ① The victim consistently stated in the investigative agency and the court of the court below that “A police officer, who was in uniform, was frightened to her own tweet and tweet his her tweet, and the man who was faced with the kweet clothes similar to her tweet, was tightly tweeted, even though she continued to 10 minutes of her tweet, was frightd to her own tweet in D, and then the police officer was frighted to her own tweet the tweet in D’s station, so that the police officer was frightd to her tweet the tweet.”