The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s imprisonment (one year and six months) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant led to confession and reflects the crime of this case, and that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment for the same crime.

However, in full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the circumstances leading to the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the instant crime, etc., such as the fact that the amount of fraud by the Defendant through the instant crime is very large, the failure to recover any damage was made, the failure to reach an agreement with the victim to the trial, and the fact that there was no change in circumstances that led to the trial of the lower court and the punishment were different, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the lower

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, since it is obvious that the "victim A" of the crime 2-3 of the judgment of the court below is a clerical error of "victim N", it shall be corrected in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure.