logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.01 2017고단1418
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year.

on the part of the defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On October 6, 2014, Defendant A was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor due to fraud, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on March 4, 2015.

Defendant

C On November 5, 2015, the Busan District Court was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. in the branch of the Dong branch of the Busan District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on July 20, 2016.

[2] Defendant A and B’s joint crime was committed by Defendant A and B, upon receiving a request for the purchase of a string vehicle from C that became aware of one’s own transaction, and the victim G and the market value of H stringing 20 million won was agreed on two occasions for the sale and purchase of the string vehicle (hereinafter “stringing vehicle”) but became unusable due to the failure to purchase the string vehicle. At around January 23, 2017, Defendant A and B heard that the victim would be only the victim to purchase the string vehicle near the Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City J. 20, and it was considered that the police officer did not report the string vehicle to the investigation agency, and that the string vehicle was not damaged by the stringing vehicle.

On January 23, 2017, at around 23:20, the Defendants were parked in the “K” located near the said “J”, and the Defendant A provided that the victims, who were sitting in the driver’s seat of the Switzerland, would be dead off. After disclosing the identity of “the police officer,” the Defendants presented the same as the police officer’s identification card, and then, “I are the police, and are going on and off the police.”

The borrower stated that he is unable to operate by reporting the suspension of operation, and that he is not able to produce his identification card, and that he was engaged in the act as a police officer who controlled the vehicle by obtaining the resident registration certificate from the injured party, and the defendant B was next to the defendant A.

arrow