1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the first instance by the court concerning this case are set forth in Article 2-b of the judgment of the first instance.

Paragraph (1) “Judgment on the Defendant’s defense of extinctive prescription” is the same as the entry in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the following parts: thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The judgment of the court of first instance that "the defendant's assertion of the completion of the extinctive prescription is not permissible as an abuse of rights against the principle of good faith" is justified in conclusion. ② The circumstances cited by the court of first instance in calculating consolation money for the plaintiffs, etc. are the circumstances cited by the judgment of the court of first instance, and as well as the network D, it was found that the defendant was convicted of the facts constituting the violation of the National Security Act (espionage) in the criminal judgment of this case against the defendant, and that the defendant was the co-defendant, F, and H et al. were not acquitted through the judgment of the court of second instance, and that the above judgment of the court of first instance recognized consolation money for the damages of KRW 1,2, and KRW 200 million which became final and conclusive to the above F et al. al. al. 1, 200,000 won, KRW 205 billion, KRW 500,000,000,000,000 won.

B. The defendant's defense of extinctive prescription is decided 1.