beta
Text
1. Defendant B shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 110,00,000 and the interest rate of KRW 12% per annum from February 8, 2019 to the date of full payment.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the parties 1) Defendant B is the multi-household housing Hdong (hereinafter “instant building”) under the name of “G” on the ground of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F ground.
(2) The Defendant E-Association (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) is the owner of subparagraph 1, and Defendant C is a mutual aid company that operated a L Licensed Real Estate Agent Office located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J building and K, and Defendant D is a licensed real estate agent that operated a N Licensed Real Estate Agent Office located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. 2) The Defendant E-Association (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) is a mutual aid company that entered into a mutual aid agreement between Defendant C and Defendant D, a real estate broker, to compensate for property damage incurred to the parties to a transaction by intention or negligence within the deductible amount of KRW 100 million.
B. On July 6, 2015, the Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement on the instant building I with Defendant C and Defendant D’s brokerage to lease the instant building I by setting the deposit amount of KRW 110 million from Defendant B, from August 9, 2015 to August 9, 2017 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).
(2) On July 6, 2015, Defendant B paid KRW 170,00 on July 7, 2015 as down payment, respectively. 2) On the third floor of the instant building, there are two rooms in two units and two units in the right household to the left side household, and two units in the left side household were indicated as “O-ho,” and “I-ho,” on the ground that Defendant B divided the O-ho, two units of the instant building into two units of the instant building into two units of units of units and building numbers at will, not building numbers, on the registry. The building register of each unit of the instant building was registered as O-ho, based on the direction visible when entering the building from the elevator to the building.
3. However, Defendant C and Defendant D are the instant case.