1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The circumstances leading up to the decision of non-recognition of refugee status ① The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on a short-term visit (C-3) on October 2, 2017 as a man with the nationality of the Republic of Senna, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on October 26, 2017 on the ground that “a threat of a private degree punishment on the ground of a non-continctity with a private degree” was “a threat of a private degree punishment on the ground of a non-continctity with a private degree.”

② On March 29, 2019, the Defendant rendered a decision to deny refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against the Plaintiff on the ground that “The Plaintiff’s ground for refugee status is only a matter that the Plaintiff ought to resolve through its judicial system as a matter of personal retaliation regarding the act of retaliation, and does not constitute booming on the ground of race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group or political opinion, which constitutes a requirement for the definition of refugee status.”

③ Although the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on July 30, 2019.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 to 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion has fleded to the Republic of Korea since he/she raped the senegal in the Senegal.

Therefore, the instant disposition that did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee is unlawful.

3. In full view of the provisions of Article 1 and Article 2 subparag. 1 of the former Refugee Act, Article 1 of the 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees, and Article 1 of the 1967 Protocol on the Status of Refugees, “persecution” which serves as the requirement for recognition of refugee status should be limited to “a race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group, or political opinion.”

The grounds alleged by the Plaintiff by itself are not based on “human race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a specific social group, or political opinion,” which is the cause of gambling that serves as a requirement for recognition of refugee status.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

4. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable.