1. The judgment of the first instance, including the Plaintiff’s claim added by this court, is modified as follows.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 24, 2018, the Plaintiff was faced with an accident where the back lid of the vehicle was absent the front lid of the vehicle without properly covering the road near the area to be discharged, by driving a car siren on or around 12:30 on October 24, 2018 (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. The Defendant recognized that it is an insurer responsible for compensating the Plaintiff for damages caused by the instant accident.

C. On October 24, 2018, the Plaintiff sent text messages to the Defendant’s employees or the employees in charge of the damage evaluators, and contacted the Plaintiff as a matter of compensation for pasia over several times with the Defendant’s employees, by sending text messages to the effect that “the head is cut off due to shock and pasium.”

The Plaintiff received several medical treatments on October 25, 2018, including receiving medical treatment, at C dental clinics prior to the instant accident, and received treatment on several occasions. On December 3, 2018, the Plaintiff received treatment on the right-hand 1 Daegu dental clinic.

On December 6, 2018, the above Council member issued to the Plaintiff a medical certificate stating that “the name of the soldier was frightened, X-RAY was frighten, and there was no frighten consciousness as a result of X-RAY shooting, and it showed a marity by the external force of unknown details.”

E. The Plaintiff spent the sum of KRW 210,300 at Cental clinic for the medical expenses for the 1st head of Daegu Daegu (including the cost of issuing a medical certificate) on the right side, and spent KRW 371,700 in total when he/she received the crypt treatment from D dental clinic.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 8, 9, Gap 11 through 16, Eul 9, the purpose of the whole pleadings and arguments]

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. According to the above fact of recognition of the occurrence of damages liability, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as the insurer.

B. Determination 1 on the amount of damages) According to the above fact of recognition, the Plaintiff is an accident in this case.