A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, there is a charge of forging private documents and uttering of falsified investigation documents.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, a single-class construction company, is operating the Fund in the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd. Around November 7, 2011, the Defendant, a general construction company, concluded a contract with a victim and a contracting company (the owner of a new construction site) on the condition that the victim will purchase 525 square meters of the above site from November 9, 201 to March 31, 201, in relation to the new construction project of the victims of the Daejeon Seo-gu I land at around 1050 square meters in total, with respect to the total construction cost of KRW 1.34,2 million in total, and construction cost of the new construction project of the victims on the condition that the victim would purchase 525 square meters of the above site from November 9, 201 to March 31, 2012 (the owner of a new construction site) but the building should be completed by the Promotion of Special Research and Development Zones Act, so it is possible to divide the land in the name of the State and J).

Accordingly, while the Defendant was performing construction works after being transferred from the victim to the account in the name of F in the name of the contract price, such as KRW 42.6 million around November 8, 201, KRW 42.6 million around December 19, 201, KRW 42.6 million around January 18, 201, KRW 93,9.4 million around January 18, 201, the details of the transaction between the victim and the subcontractor were required as evidence for the report of the additional taxes by the said State, Section G, and subcontractor.

On April 24, 2012, the Defendant had the intent to acquire money from the victim by deception, and on April 24, 2012, “G and subcontractor” to E, a regular manager of the victim company, at the victim’s office.

4. By the end of 25. 1/4 quarter additional tax returns are required. The account details transferred from the account under the name of J, the nominal owner of the construction contract, to G from the account under the name of J to the account under the name of G, whichever is the nominal owner of the construction contract, need to be issued only the tax invoice and promptly return the entire amount on the day, if the transfer is made again.

“However, the Defendant stated that “The construction work amount is KRW 671 million in F account at the time when E deposits the construction work amount with the head of G company bank,” to K, who was a site warden at the said new construction site.