logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.08.17 2014나2610
손해배상(자)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the defendant ordering payment in excess of the following amount shall be revoked:

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the underlying facts and the occurrence of liability for damages are the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Except as otherwise stated below within the scope of liability for damages, it shall be as stated in each corresponding item of the attached Table of calculation of damages.

In principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but the period of less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The current price calculation at the time of the accident shall be based on the calculation of the amount of damages, which deducts interim interest at the rate of 5/12 per month as a simple interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

(A) The Plaintiff’s date of birth, gender, and date of accident: Fborn and female B: The age at the time of the accident: 53 years old and 2 months: 31.48 years old: the income and maximum working age: The maximum working age of the Plaintiff: the urban daily wage, and the hospitalization period from February 9, 2014, which turn 60 years old: 276 days in total, due to the instant accident, from April 15, 2007 to the same year.

5. The same year from May 14, 2007 to October 26, 2007 at G Hospital;

6.2. The same year from April 11, 2008 to April 2008 at H hospitals for 20 days;

7. From December 1, 2008 to April 10, 2009, for 88 days and 131 days from August 31, 2009 to September 10, 2009, each of the pre-North Korean University Hospital was hospitalized at each of the pre-North Korean University Hospital.

G) From April 15, 2007 to January 15, 2008, the period of hospitalization is deemed to have continued to be hospitalized by the Plaintiff for the convenience of calculating the loss of labor capacity: 100% (2) thereafter to February 9, 2014: ① 6.9% (=23% x 30%) on the right side: 6.9% on the right side (i) on the right side-hand side-hand side-hand side-hand side-hand side-hand side (i) on a temporary disability for two years from the water day; Mabrid conflict with the right right side-hand side-hand side-hand side-hand back-hand ray; 23% on the right side-A-3% on the basis of the application of Section Ⅱ-3 of the Section 6.9% on the right side-hand side-hand side-hand side-hand ray; and (ii) on the basis of 30% on credit.

arrow