Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

As the victim B, the defendant is a person who resides in the third floor of the third floor in Pyeongtaek-si C owned by the victim B.

1. On July 5, 2014, in order to prove that the Defendant’s mother is a basic recipient of the real estate lease agreement without the lessor’s consent at his/her own discretion, the Defendant forged private documents and used the investigation documents in the column of the location of the “real estate lease agreement” by using the mar-type pen, “Seoul-do E (C),” “16 square meters in the family house, area,” “3 million won in the deposit column,” “150,000 won in the monthly rent column,” “150,000 won in the column of the special agreement,” “by October 2, 2019, in the column of the special agreement,” “on July 5, 2014, in the name of the lessor, “F, resident registration number,” “F,” and “B” in the name of the public official of the office of the Defendant’s mother on his/her own name and sealed the Defendant’s name and sealed the Defendant’s name on the same day.

In the end, for the purpose of exercising rights and obligations, the Defendant forged and exercised one copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of B, which is a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. Fraud B, on March 5, 2013, acquired the ownership of the third-story housing located in Pyeongtaek-si C, and on July 31, 2014, leased the part of the first-story housing to a person who is the victim J with a deposit of KRW 25 million (2 million in contract amount, intermediate payment of KRW 20 million, and KRW 3 million in balance).

around September 25, 2014, the Defendant is not superior to B and his family to the victim in the above house;

The payment of the balance of 3 million won was made after the collection (one floor of the third floor of the house) of the house (one floor of the house), and the payment was made in falsity.

However, the Defendant did not have been entrusted with the right to receive any balance from B, and even if the Defendant received any balance, he did not have the intent or ability to use it for repair of the part of the third floor housing.

Ultimately, the Defendant is the victim as above.