logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.09.29 2016나2070216
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant-Counterclaim plaintiff's counterclaim that has been changed in exchange at the trial is dismissed.

2. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff).

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A (hereinafter “A”) is a medical corporation under the Medical Service Act for the purpose of establishing and operating a medical institution, and is operating a F Hospital in a building located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E (hereinafter “instant building”).

B. A’s representative status and management right transfer 1) A’s representative status and management right transfer to H around October 2010, G, a director with A’s representative authority, has been holding a temporary board of directors of H on January 20, 2011, with a view to returning to the original state, if a mutual dispute arises or the payment of the price is delayed. However, G agreed to receive a resignation letter of president and a resignation letter of new director under H’s name for restoration. 2) G held temporary board of directors of H on January 20, 201, in accordance with the agreement.

The above board of directors expressed their intent to resign from the position of director and chief director, and a resolution, including the appointment of H as a new chief director, was made (hereinafter “instant resolution”).

3) G submitted to A a letter of resignation on January 20, 201, which contains a statement that he/she would resign from A’s position at the time of the above board of directors. On January 20, 2011, the registration of alteration was made on January 21, 2011, that G resigned from office with the power of representation and that H was the only director with the power of representation. (c) H did not pay the acquisition price at all differently from the agreement and the agreement. G filed a lawsuit for confirmation of existence (Seoul Central District Court 201Gahap46130) with the Seoul Central District Court (Seoul District Court 201Gahap46130) with respect to “A shall confirm that the resolution in this case is primarily null and void.”

On November 3, 2011, the above court dismissed part of the above lawsuit and declared that the remaining claims were dismissed, and G appealed appealed.

2. The above lawsuit.

arrow