logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.02.07 2017고단2576
절도등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, around 10:00 on December 20, 2016, on the street in the vicinity of the Samsungdong office located in the center of Yangsan-si, Yangsan-si. 10:00 on December 20, 2016, the Defendant stolen the total amount of KRW 18,000,00,000, for the money owned by the victim who was on board the taxi operated by the victim C, using the crebs set by the victim C in order to ask for a path.

around 14:45 on June 30, 2017, the Defendant sought money from the victim D (58 years) who is currently in a lawsuit for confirmation of non-existence of paternity due to the fact that there is no parental relation between the two-way office and the office located in Yangsan-si, Yangsan-si and 2:36 on June 30, 2017, and requested the victim to do so. However, the victim said that “to die” would not be said to be “to die,” and said, she collected the wall from the victim’s office, which is a dangerous object on the victim’s book (20cm in total length), and carried the wall back with the victim as the victim she saw.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

On October 2, 2017, the Defendant, at around 21:30 on October 2, 2017, 2017, brought about a 18,000 won in cash owned by the victim, who was in a public performance at the distance of the G store located in Busan Dong-gu, by taking advantage of the gaps of surveillance by the victim H, who was in a public performance at the distance of the G store in Busan Dong-gu, and brought about a knife and 4592. The Defendant, on June 30, 2017, demanded the victim to take the knife with a passenger of the passenger of the passenger taxi operated by the victim I to take the knife up to 39,00 U.S. office building at the center of Seonam-gu, Busan Metropolitan City at the destination.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the fare even if he did not get a taxi.

Nevertheless, the defendant was committed as if he were to pay the above taxi charges, and the victim was driving a taxi to the above place.

arrow