beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of two years and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of three years.
However, as to Defendant A, this shall not apply.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants operated a dry field farmer while running a “F farm”, which is a stock farm (hereinafter referred to as the “instant farm”) in the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, by raising Mad Co., Ltd., from June 1985 to June 1995, and the victims G (47 taxes) was a person with intellectual disability 2, who works for a dry field farmer at around 195 to around 197, such as giving monthly pay from “H stock farm” located in the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and Cheongju-si.
person is a person.
1. On July 197, 1997, the Defendants: (a) the network I operating a brokerage business in the franchising area; and (b) whether the Defendants would have to work for the disabled in the stock farm located in the ceiling.
“Along with the proposal, I had the victim start to the farm of this case in response to the improvement of the above proposal, such as the comparison of meals with the above I. From that time, I had the victim start to the farm of this case. From July 12, 2016, I had the victim do work in the farm of this case, such as treatment of excreta and transportation of feed, etc., and put the victim under their control and management while getting the victim to move to the warehouse located within the farm of this case.
However, the farm of this case is located at a remote area with 500 meters away from neighboring villages, and the victim was unable to communicate with people with intellectual disabilities or free communication with outside and outside. Since the mother and mother of the victim and the mother of the victim were those with intellectual disability, they could not find the victim or make contact with the victim. Thus, the defendants and I used the above circumstances, even if they do work for a stock farm and dry field to the victim in the farm of this case, even if they were to do so by considering the mother of the victim in the weekend or name of the victim, they would make a leave or pay the victim wages, and even if they did not think that they would have given leave or paid a normal wage to the victim, the victim is transferred.