Text
1. The Intellectual Property Tribunal shall revoke a trial decision in connection with a case No. 1296 of August 13, 2014;
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The name of the device of this case: Port 1)/registration date/registration number: on February 18, 2013: Claim No. 4708483: 【Request No. 10 m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m.: 201 p.m. m. m. m. m. m. (10)m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. (11) m. m. m. m. to supply all of them to 3 p.m. m. m. (11) m. m. m. m. m. (10) m. m. m. m. (10) m. m. m. m. m. m. m. (10) m. to 3 p.m. m. m. m. m. m. m. (1) m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m.) m. m. m. m. (1) m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m.)
B. A description and drawings of the proposed complaint subject to verification conducted by the plaintiff of the proposed complaint subject to verification are as shown in attached Form 2.
C. Although the comparison is also applicable to “invention”, it is to be indicated as “an invention” for convenience.
1) Compared prior design 1 (Evidence A No. 7 and 6, published on October 6, 2010, pertaining to the “sick dog” described in Article 2015988 of the Chinese Utility Model Gazette.